@article{oai:nifs-k.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001255,
 author = {中谷, 太希 and 村田, 憲亮 and 杉野, 正尭 and 安田, 健人 and 山下, 龍一郎 and Nakatani, Taiki and Murata, Kensuke and Sugino, Takaaki and Yasuda, Kento and Yamashita, Ryuichiro},
 journal = {学術研究紀要 / 鹿屋体育大学},
 month = {Jul},
 note = {When I used an establishment standard shown in the newsletter for the campaign for the progress of this study, 
which is aimed at “Driggs”, it was to clarify the umpire of one kind of the Japan Gymnastic Association official 
recognition, an establishment judgment, and the grounds and the establishment point of reference. As a result, the 
unevenness that occurred in the criteria became clear while I met you whether “a clear hop” was seen in an umpire 
focusing most. Few players can express “a clear hop,” and this suggests a delay of the technology development if I 
return the other side. Conversely, you should not bring in that I say with “both hands simultaneous support” in the 
establishment condition of rule words called based on the way of expression of being various, and it is thought that 
you should proceed through enforcement deduction as deviation from an eidolon. It is thought that the background in 
which the establishment condition called “a support for both hands at the same time” was established newly and that 
the criteria about “a clear hop” are not unified as having become clear in this study, although a stipulation is not done 
about the process as the cause. Moreover, in addition to “Driggs,” it is thought that it is related that “simplification” 
promotes “the depersonalization” of the marking rule. However, the problem of the aforementioned street clearly 
occurs and should be excluded from an establishment condition when “both hands simultaneous support” are brought 
into the establishment condition.
Itself prescribed “the judgment in the exercise progress of the skill” about the establishment standard called “the 
clear hop” that the unevenness occurs for a judgement result in the current situation and cannot delineate the success 
or failure definitely. Conversely, the originality of the skill called “Driggs” is not found when it is clear to carry a 
function of the distinction of the skill similar to “Driggs,” and the establishment condition called “a clear hop” takes 
away this establishment condition.
Hence, in the practice spot of the coaching, it is thought that it is necessary to push forward technology 
development even if anyone sees it to judge it with “a clear hop.”, 本研究の目的は「ドリッグス」を意図して実施した運動経過に対し，Newsletter に示された成立基準を用いた場合，日本体操協会公認 1 種審判員がどのような判定を行うのか，成立判定及びその根拠となる成立判断の基準はどのようなものであるかを明らかにすることであった．その結果，審判員が最も重視するのは「明確なとび」が見られるかどうかであった．しかし，その判定基準にはばらつきが生じていることが明らかとなった．一方，〈とび〉の表現の仕方は多様であることを踏まえれば，「両手同時支持」ということを〈とび〉という規定詞の成立条件に持ち込むべきではなく，あくまで理想像からの逸脱として実施減点等で対処すべきであると考えられる．コーチングの実践現場においては，誰が見ても明らかに「明確なとび」と判定できるような技術開発を進めてゆく必要があると考えられる．, 実践的研究},
 pages = {17--30},
 title = {あん馬における「ドリッグス」の成立判定に関する一考察},
 volume = {60},
 year = {2022}
}